What should Philadelphia Flyers’ plan be for Rasmus Ristolainen?

There was once no transfer made by way of Chuck Fletcher closing summer season extra polarizing than his resolution to business for Rasmus Ristolainen.

That’s to not say that different strikes didn’t obtain scrutiny. Shipping out a long-standing big name like Jakub Voracek was once all the time going to show heads. The acquisition of Ryan Ellis was once puzzled for his perceived damage possibility, worries that in the long run proved justified. Even signing Martin Jones as a backup netminder after 3 consecutive deficient seasons with the San Jose Sharks drew complaint. But it was once the verdict to prioritize Ristolainen that almost all divided the fan base.

Ristolainen’s supporters cited his measurement, skating talent, and most significantly, his innate aggression and willingness to ship hits as parts that the Flyers’ protection sorely lacked. Skeptics famous that for years, Ristolainen had graded out as one of the vital league’s worst defensemen by way of complicated even energy metrics, and on the very least, were seriously overused and positioned in assignments some distance past his precise skill stage. By providing up a package deal headlined by way of a first-round select, Fletcher and the Flyers appeared to be strongly implying that they considered Ristolainen to be a some distance higher participant than the stats hinted he was once.

The 2021-22 season would decide which aspect was once appropriate. Or possibly least fallacious.

And in many ways, Ristolainen did exceed the expectancies of the statistically vulnerable. His partnership with Travis Sanheim proved a minimum of a average luck, and Ristolainen unquestionably did win over many within the fan base because of his truculent option to off-puck play. But the hope {that a} exchange of surroundings from the constantly uncompetitive Buffalo Sabres to Philadelphia would lead to an entire 180-degree turnaround in his on-ice effects proved unfounded. By essentially the most complete fashions within the public sphere, Ristolainen mainly remained Ristolainen, for higher or worse. And now, after locking him down with a five-year, $25.5 million contract, the query dealing with the Flyers is learn how to get essentially the most out of the burly defenseman for the following half-decade.

What should Philadelphia Flyers’ plan be for Rasmus Ristolainen?

Ristolainen’s Flyers debut in reality got here two video games later than at first expected, because of an upper-body damage he suffered overdue within the preseason. Instead, it wasn’t till Oct. 20 towards the Boston Bruins when Ristolainen formally donned the orange and black.

He didn’t precisely make an excellent first influence. Less regarding than Ristolainen going needless via his first seven video games (in his new position, the group wasn’t asking him to provide a lot offensively from the again finish) was once that the Flyers have been getting obliterated with the Finnish defenseman at the ice right through his first two weeks’ price of video games, to the music of a 39.22 % anticipated objective proportion at five-on-five. It gave the look of all the skeptics would be confirmed appropriate, in essentially the most painful method imaginable for the Flyers.

But then, in early November, the Sanheim-Ristolainen pairing began to expand reliable chemistry. Over a six-game run, the Flyers gathered 66 % (just about two-thirds) of the anticipated targets at five-on-five with them at the ice, and whilst their statistical efficiency fell off quickly after — in tandem with the remainder of the group, in a swoon that may in the long run get head trainer Alain Vigneault relieved of his tasks — it remained the most productive of all 3 Philadelphia pairings.

Ristolainen would stay joined on the hip to Sanheim for the majority of the remainder of the season, apart from a two-game experiment in overdue November and early December which positioned him along Ivan Provorov at the first pair, and two video games in January after Sanheim discovered himself in COVID-19 protocol. Ristolainen himself would omit two video games in protocol as neatly, along with every other transient absence in overdue February because of every other upper-body factor.

By then, on the other hand, the focal point was once much less on Ristolainen’s on-ice exploits, and extra on his off-ice contract drama. Given his expiring contract and the Flyers’ minuscule playoff hopes, Ristolainen was once a logical option to be shipped out on the business closing date for long run property — if the entrance workplace determined {that a} contract extension wouldn’t be within the playing cards for the 6-foot-4 defenseman. The Flyers did flirt with the speculation of buying and selling him sooner than the March 21 closing date, and a marketplace virtually unquestionably would have materialized, given the considerable package deal (headlined by way of a first-round select) that Florida in the long run relinquished for the in a similar way competitive stay-at-home blueliner Ben Chiarot, who was once additionally on an expiring contract.

Instead, on the other hand, Fletcher and the Flyers selected to double down on their resolution to procure Ristolainen, locking him as much as a five-year contract price $5.1 million in line with season on March 10, about two weeks sooner than the closing date. Suddenly, Ristolainen was once now not a condo participant; he was once a key component of the franchise’s long run.

Ristolainen’s season got here to a untimely finish after he suffered every other upper-body damage right through the 9-2 laugher of a loss to the Washington Capitals on April 12. His ultimate stat line in his first Flyers season: 66 video games, two targets, 14 assists and about 5,000 on-line debates referring to his price as a participant. (That might neatly be a sarcasm.)

Was Ristolainen’s season a excellent one?

Now, for a debate to be an actual one, there must be two viable aspects. If Ristolainen’s season were undeniably disastrous, his defenders would have quieted to a peep, the best way that Andrew MacDonald all of a sudden misplaced all strengthen amongst participants of the fan base simplest in a while after signing his extension.

With Ristolainen, it’s extra complicated. A coherent case can be made by way of Ristolainen supporters that he won’t have excelled in his first season with the Flyers, however a minimum of held his personal and supplied price to the membership.

The positive idea referring to Ristolainen heading into 2021-22 was once easy: free of the depressing Sabres, Ristolainen’s on-ice effects have been destined to reinforce, and he would offer a much-needed bodily presence to the Flyers’ protection, serving to Sanheim (his projected spouse) maximum of all, given Sanheim’s extra finesse-and-skill orientated taste of play.

Ristolainen’s uncooked five-on-five complicated metrics don’t glance nice in the beginning look — a 46.92 % xG proportion, 45.2 % shot try proportion, 48.65 % objective proportion. But it’s price remembering that the Flyers as an entire have been a poorly appearing group; mainly everybody’s metrics have been underneath the 50 % mark. Relative to the remainder of the Philadelphia protection regulars, Ristolainen completed within the height half of of all 3 classes, simplest constantly trailing his common spouse, Sanheim.

What should Philadelphia Flyers’ plan be for Rasmus Ristolainen?

All statistics courtesy of Evolving-Hockey and five-on-five simplest.

Ristolainen unquestionably introduced his promised physicality as neatly. His 230 hits simply led the group, and he ranked as one of the vital league leaders in hit frequency amongst defensemen as neatly. Acknowledging that the counting of hits can be quite inconsistent throughout other arenas, Ristolainen ranked 14th amongst NHL blueliners (with a minimum of 400 mins performed) with 9.75 hits in line with 60 mins. Given that he averaged 21:26 mins in line with night time, that’s about 3.5 hits in line with recreation delivered by way of Ristolainen.

Finally, there’s the easy fact that Sanheim did have a powerful season — sturdy sufficient to win the Barry Ashbee Trophy given to the group’s absolute best defenseman — whilst spending just about two-thirds of his five-on-five mins subsequent to Ristolainen. In reality, the Sanheim-Ristolainen pairing was once, by way of all public statistical measures, the group’s absolute best common pairing in 2021-22. None of the 5 different duos that spent a minimum of 100 mins in combination measured as much as the 6-70 pair.

What should Philadelphia Flyers’ plan be for Rasmus Ristolainen?

All metrics courtesy of Evolving-Hockey and five-on-five simplest. Only pairings with a minimum of 100 mins in combination incorporated.

So Ristolainen ranked within the height half of of Flyers blueliners in uncooked on-ice effects, he racked up heaps of hits and was once a part of the group’s maximum a success defensive pair. He was once high quality closing season, appropriate?

The cracks in Ristolainen’s statistical profile

At first look, Ristolainen’s 2021-22 efficiency turns out cast. Sure, his offensive manufacturing went down, however that was once anticipated given his reduced energy play position and less general mins performed. Relative to the remainder of the Flyers’ protection, he reputedly held his personal — a minimum of in keeping with a cursory have a look at the metrics and a basic view of his position.

The maximum complete statistical fashions — which be mindful more than one out of doors elements — have a some distance much less beneficiant view of Ristolainen’s paintings, on the other hand.

By Goals Above Replacement (a worth metric which permits avid gamers to be ranked), Ristolainen checked in at +2.8, striking him 113th amongst NHL defensemen with a minimum of 600 mins performed. In phrases of Ristolainen’s have an effect on on his teammates’ xG differentials at even energy, Ristolainen had a -0.103 xG RAPM have an effect on, striking him within the twenty third percentile amongst blueliners. And when it comes to his have an effect on on uncooked shot differential, he was once even worse — negative-4.81, within the 7th percentile.

So why the discrepancy? How did Ristolainen carry out so poorly by way of the complicated fashions like GAR and RAPM when his pairing with Sanheim labored lovely neatly — a minimum of by way of 2021-22 Philadelphia Flyers requirements?

Well, it’s most commonly as a result of Sanheim carried out a lot better when clear of Ristolainen, whilst Ristolainen’s effects totally tanked when no longer skating with Sanheim.

What should Philadelphia Flyers’ plan be for Rasmus Ristolainen?

This wasn’t a case of 2 avid gamers raising each and every different. Sanheim carried out decently with Ristolainen, sure. But clear of Ristolainen, he driven the Flyers above 50 % in each class apart from xG, and he got here actual with regards to doing that, too. On the opposite hand, when Ristolainen was once clear of Sanheim, his effects have been dumpster-fire stage unhealthy — a 40 % xG proportion, and a 31.25 % precise objective proportion. Based in this data, it certain turns out like Sanheim was once wearing Ristolainen — no longer the wrong way round.

Another trace that Ristolainen wasn’t the only riding the bus on his pairing with Sanheim? By guide monitoring of person on-ice movements (as tracked by way of the incomparable Corey Sznajder), Ristolainen simply isn’t excellent at very a lot — a minimum of relative to the common NHL defenseman.

What should Philadelphia Flyers’ plan be for Rasmus Ristolainen?

Now, there’s a large number of knowledge right here, and it’s no longer required to know what each and every time period approach — even though maximum are quite self-explanatory for longtime hockey lovers. What’s maximum necessary is working out that any line within the purple implies that Ristolainen is worse than league moderate by way of mentioned metric, and any within the blue implies that he graded out higher than league moderate.

That’s a large number of purple.

So the place does Ristolainen in reality thrive, in line with Sznajder’s monitoring? Those spaces in reality fit up moderately neatly with the attention take a look at, and basic common sense referring to Ristolainen’s observe document.

In the offensive zone, he can give price by way of serving to his forwards to create bad possibilities, whether or not that’s by way of making himself a goal for a deadly go, or getting level photographs via visitors to create rebounds and deflections. This tracks along with his luck as an influence play quarterback in Buffalo — Ristolainen does possess reliable offensive zone talent, although he doesn’t qualify as really dynamic.

His sturdy effects by way of defensive zone puck touches and retrievals is, by way of proxy, a point of evidence that his energy and bodily play does result in Ristolainen successful his justifiable share of puck battles. In order to the touch the puck, one has to win the puck, and Ristolainen is absolutely in a position to doing that. And he’s even no longer too unhealthy at getting the puck out of risk — on the very least, he can transparent the zone and provides his teammates an opportunity to regroup, although his defensive zone exits hardly ever include regulate and ship his teammates again up ice at the assault.

The downside? Ristolainen isn’t excellent at the rest.

This is helping to provide an explanation for why the Sanheim-Ristolainen pairing “works.” Ristolainen wins puck battles clears the zone underneath force, and in reality legitimately is helping maintain ownership and create high quality photographs when the Flyers are at the assault (Sanheim may be moderately adept at this). As for Sanheim, he mainly has to do the entirety else, and a minimum of closing season, he proved greater than in a position to doing simply that. But Sanheim — as proven by way of his effects clear of Ristolainen — was once much more adept when no longer requested to take action a lot. Ristolainen, however, fell off a cliff when requested to tackle extra pairing tasks at five-on-five.

Moving ahead with Ristolainen

Ristolainen will more than likely be the topic of debates over his price in the course of the conclusion of his profession. But one debate is mercifully over — whether or not the Flyers should or should no longer dedicate long-term to Ristolainen.

They did. For 5 extra years, at $5.1 million in line with yr. That contract is signed, sealed and delivered.

All that’s left now’s to decide how the Flyers should now absolute best make the most of the asset that they’ve locked up neatly into the overdue 2020s.

Was the extension a smart decision? Basically, all the absolute best public statistical fashions would lead one to imagine that the solution is a convincing no. But up to the Ristolainen dialog is gifted as a “stats versus eyes” debate, the attention take a look at in reality doesn’t strengthen Ristolainen an excessive amount of both, in particular when all the movements that the eyes see are added up and compiled.

Ristolainen is normally passive in impartial zone protection, giving fighters somewhat simple get right of entry to into the offensive zone. He doesn’t generate a lot in the best way managed defensive zone exits, which means that he supplies little when it comes to transitional assist. He doesn’t rating a lot at five-on-five, and in reality by no means has, after controlling for ice time. Yes, he’s undeniably bodily, and the “intimidation factor” that avid gamers communicate of is sort of unquestionably actual; NHL avid gamers aren’t universally mendacity after they say they don’t experience taking part in towards Ristolainen. But it’s tough to legitimately make the case that Ristolainen is in reality the kind of participant that “winning teams need” when he’s by no means in reality been on a successful group on the NHL stage, and when the Flyers in reality were given worse after obtaining him.

Sure, the deficient performances of his groups aren’t all his fault — that may be a daft statement. Buffalo’s roster has lengthy been restricted from height to backside, and the 2021-22 Flyers have been ravaged by way of damage. But it’s additionally transparent that it’s no longer like Ristolainen’s physicality has made his groups measurably higher than they should be on paper. He’s 9 seasons into his NHL profession, and no longer a unmarried certainly one of his groups has ever overachieved, even somewhat. That doesn’t talk neatly to the meant have an effect on of his mere presence.

Also, the Flyers’ coaches made it abundantly transparent that they themselves identified his obstacles, even because the entrance workplace opened the checkbook to stay him. How? Because Ellis, the projected first-pair right-handed defenseman, overlooked 78 video games, and the coaches attempted Ristolainen — ostensibly the following RHD at the intensity chart after Ellis — at the height pair with Ivan Provorov all of two times. It was once an implicit admission that they didn’t imagine Ristolainen would achieve first-pair mins. Yet in addition they deemed a defenseman with a second-pair ceiling to be price $5.1 million in line with season on their cap. A curious valuation, to mention the least.

But at this level, Ristolainen’s contract is what it’s. The group’s center of attention now must be on getting essentially the most out of the 27-year-old blueliner. Ideally, as they already reputedly know, he should be paired with a puck-mover, with Sanheim status as a shining instance of such. Ristolainen has additionally succeeded previously with extra defensively-oriented companions, as long as mentioned participant additionally is an effective (if unspectacular) passer. Jake McCabe are compatible the invoice in Buffalo. If given the appropriate form of spouse, Ristolainen can dangle his personal on a moment pair — he showed as a lot in 2021-22 with Sanheim. But his complicated metrics indicate that he’s no longer going to lift that pair, both.

In brief, Ristolainen is being paid like a second-pair defenseman who can play at the first pair in the appropriate instances. In fact, he’s more than likely extra of a third-pair defenseman who can play on the second one pair in the appropriate instances. And given his utilization in 2021-22, the Flyers appear to seize that, a minimum of to some extent.

Which raises every other thought — may Ristolainen be absolute best served at the 0.33 pair, subsequent to a teen like Cam York or Egor Zamula? It’s unquestionably imaginable. Ristolainen may just nonetheless deliver his intangible bodily intimidation think about a restricted position, whilst taking the lead in puck battles for his less-imposing younger spouse. Ristolainen’s mins would be more uncomplicated and less, and possibly, his complicated metrics would in the end in the end reinforce.

The downside, after all, is that then the Flyers would be paying $5.1 million in cap house for a No. 5 defenseman, and with Ellis anticipated to omit a minimum of the beginning of the season (and possibly excess of that), it implies that Justin Braun once more would be driven right into a top-four position that he’s no longer preferably suited for take care of at this level of profession, and that’s no longer even bringing up the soar of religion that the Flyers are taking by way of assuming that Tony DeAngelo can thrive at the first pair subsequent to Provorov.

Most most likely, Ristolainen will start the 2022-23 season appropriate again in his previous spot subsequent to Sanheim on the second one pair. And if Sanheim is as efficient as he was once closing season, that duo will more than likely dangle its personal.

But a season clear of the Sabres doesn’t seem to have modified Ristolainen at his core. He was once nonetheless the similar unsuitable participant from again in Buffalo, even after the Flyers reduce on his tasks. And until his tasks are reduce even additional — and there’s little reason why to imagine the Flyers are in a position to take action — a redux of his 2021-22 efficiency is more than likely the most productive case situation.

All statistics courtesy of Evolving-Hockey, Natural Stat Trick and Corey Sznajder.

(Photo: Eric Hartline / USA Today)

Leave a Comment